By Dan Hallett on November 18, 2016
Robo-advisors offer investment advice through websites and mobile applications. In the U.S. this segment – which was born after the Financial Crisis – manages tens of billions of dollars for clients. American robo-advisors can provide investment advice with minimal personal contact. And while they are Registered Investment Advisers, they have the ability to opt-out of their fiduciary obligations according to an updated SEC policy document.
Regulatory filings (see its Form ADV) for Betterment LLC – the largest U.S. robo-advisor – show that it manages $5 billion in assets on behalf of 130,000 clients. That’s an average of about $38,000 per client. It employs 136 people – of which only 8 are registered to give investment advice and another 7 are licensed salespeople. So Betterment’s 15 licensed employees serve nearly 9,000 clients each. The typical client, then, has little or no contact with a licensed investment adviser or salesperson. This is what’s known as scalability – i.e. the ability to add clients without adding employees and systems.
Robo-advisors in Canada
In Canada, robo-advisors must register as Portfolio Managers, which cannot opt-out of their legal fiduciary duty. In my column for the September 2016 issue of Investment Executive, I explain why this will limit the scalability of Canadian robo-advisors’ businesses. If they grow as planned, they will need tens of thousands of clients to succeed financially. Technology infrastructure can be built to easily handle this volume. But obligations of registered Portfolio Managers will also require a significant hiring of people who can speak with clients about their investments – and that limits scalability by adding to costs.
Wealthsimple is the only Canadian robo-advisor has released business milestones. The October 2016 issue of Report On Business magazine notes that Wealthsimple – which calls itself Canada’s largest robo-advisor – has 20,000 clients investing an average of $25,000 each. It has 5 registered individuals. I’m not privy to Wealthsimple’s plans, but they could need dozens to be able to spend the time needed to have a “meaningful discussion” with each client to gather sufficient information in order to make sure recommendations are suitable. This is the minimum regulatory requirement for all registered Portfolio Managers – robo or otherwise.
One could argue that investor-clients needn’t care about the business side of robo-advisors so long as they deliver good advice and service. But if a business is, at best, experiencing growing pains or – worse – struggling to make a profit, it can affect both the quality of advice and service.
Robo-advisors are a great innovation so I hope that they can all find a workable solution to adhere to the rules while still making it worthwhile to serve clients of all sizes (particularly those with less than $250,000). Investors will need robo-advisors to find this balance to fill the gap that will be created by new regulations and industry competitive forces.
HighView Financial Group is an investment counselling firm for affluent families and foundations. We build portfolios based on the unique goals of each client. Schedule a complimentary discovery session to see if we’re the right investment stewardship counsellors for you.
You may also be interested in:
- How Donald Trump’s Victory May Affect Your Investments
- The 5 Costs of One-Stop-Shop Wealth Advice
- F-Class Funds: Trick or Treat [Video]
- Concerns with “Fund Facts” and “ETF Facts” Risk Ratings - January 6, 2017
- Regulations Will Create Scalability Challenges for Canadian Robo-advisors - November 18, 2016
- Making Sense of Your New CRM2 Performance Report - September 14, 2016
- Self-Inflicted Problems: Mutual Fund Industry Has Fought Investor-Friendly Reforms - July 21, 2016
- Beware of Advertisements for F-series Investment Funds - May 27, 2016
- Does Hoarding Cash Protect Investors from the Bear? - March 31, 2016
- Reduced Fund Payout Is Good But Beware of Unsavoury Sales Pitch - December 16, 2015
- High-payout Funds Are a Cash Flow Mirage - November 27, 2015
- SPIVA Report Interesting but Misses Key Message for Investors - November 6, 2015
- Investors Need More Meaningful Risk Measures - July 22, 2015