By Dan Hallett on September 16, 2011
A ‘minimalist’ lifestyle usually refers to living only with the basics. The less ‘stuff’ you have, the less you have to worry about day-to-day and the happier you will be, say proponents. Perhaps you can’t part with your new smart phone, your second car or the notion of home ownership. But I am convinced that adopting minimalist-like investing style would set most investors on the path of greater happiness and prosperity.
Balanced funds are under-rated
There was a time when I poo-pooed the use of balanced funds. As I grew more interested in investor behaviour – and saw anecdotal and broad-based quantitative behavioural evidence – I embraced the idea that balanced funds are good for most people. Even though balanced funds have not been terrific performers, my research on long-term investor returns showed that investors using balanced funds saw better performance compared to using a mix of individual stock and bond funds.
While balanced funds are considered best for novice investors with modest portfolios, they are hugely under-rated for larger portfolios. There is no good reason to invest $100,000 much differently than $10,000 – with one exception. Investors with significantly more money should generally expect to pay lower percentage fees. Since most investors – novice or expert, wealthy or not – are guilty of investor misbehaviour, a reasonably-priced diversified balanced fund can be an investor’s only holding well into six-figure dollar amounts with pleasing results.
Those that doubt this ultra-simple approach should revisit a related post: The ironic comfort of balanced funds.
Avoid niche & gimmicky products
Funds and ETFs providing exposure to high-growth BRIC countries; the popular agriculture theme; or perhaps to higher-yielding infrastructure plays are exciting. I get it. When stock markets are falling and bond yields are extra-lean, these can be exciting alternatives. But these themes and strategies usually hit main street long after big institutional investors have made the easy money. I’d rather see investors go into more broadly-based funds so I have a compromise to propose.
Do you want to invest outside of Canada but avoid emphasizing more developed but debt-laden U.S. and Europe and more of the more financially-fit emerging countries? Instead of picking a BRIC or China fund consider a fund like Dynamic Global Value or Manulife Global Focused. The idea isn’t so much to run out and buy those specific funds but rather that the decision of which countries or themes to invest in should be taken out of the individual investors’ hands.
This approach keeps the portfolio more compact, makes it lower-maintenance and reduces the likelihood of disappointing performance.
Pay attention to costs
Many financial advisors think I’m too tough when it comes to investment fees and expenses. By contrast, many investors and their advocates think I’m not tough enough. Sometimes I can’t win. What’s not debatable is the importance of costs. All investors should keep an eye on fees and expenses (those that are visible and those that are not).
Nearly two years ago, I gave Globe & Mail readers a few tips on how to pay attention to costs and keep them in proper perspective.
Less is more
Portfolios should be built to match an investor’s assets with future spending plans. My partners at HighView and I use this goals-based approach to construct portfolios. Accordingly, each portfolio holding has a well-defined role to play in helping clients achieve stated goals.
When asked whether this theme or that strategy should be added to a portfolio we ask how it will help the portfolio move the client closer to his/her goals. If it doesn’t fit, we don’t consider it. If it does, then it may have a place.
Too many portfolios are product-driven, where products are added based on their availability. Rather, individual goals should define what is needed and whether the next new product or theme fits. I have no doubt that a simpler portfolio is the right structure for most investors. And if my research is any indication it won’t just make you happier – but wealthier too.
(Postscript, 19-Sep-2011: Coincidentally, the Globe & Mail today posted a video interview I did with Rob Carrick a couple of months ago. Toward the end, I re-iterate the advice of concentrating mutual fund portfolios.)
- Concerns with “Fund Facts” and “ETF Facts” Risk Ratings - January 6, 2017
- Regulations Will Create Scalability Challenges for Canadian Robo-advisors - November 18, 2016
- Making Sense of Your New CRM2 Performance Report - September 14, 2016
- Self-Inflicted Problems: Mutual Fund Industry Has Fought Investor-Friendly Reforms - July 21, 2016
- Beware of Advertisements for F-series Investment Funds - May 27, 2016
- Does Hoarding Cash Protect Investors from the Bear? - March 31, 2016
- Reduced Fund Payout Is Good But Beware of Unsavoury Sales Pitch - December 16, 2015
- High-payout Funds Are a Cash Flow Mirage - November 27, 2015
- SPIVA Report Interesting but Misses Key Message for Investors - November 6, 2015
- Investors Need More Meaningful Risk Measures - July 22, 2015