By Dan Hallett on October 3, 2010
I have been asked more than a few times by advisors whether I think product commissions will be banned. While we can never say never, I’ve had enough questions on this to warrant an article. In the October issue of Investment Executive, I highlight three reasons why I think we’re unlikely to see a commission-ban similar to plans unveiled in Britain and Australia.
This was my view before writing the article. But as I did a bit of homework on the issue, I went looking for some details in the old Fair Dealing Model. Recall that the FDM was the proposed legislation that started at the OSC in 2004 and it was moving in the direction of banning commissions. After getting watered-down, it shifted to a national initiative and was renamed Registration Reform – the new rule that was implemented just over a year ago. Hence, the industry already batted down one significant attempt to ban commissions.
- Concerns with “Fund Facts” and “ETF Facts” Risk Ratings - January 6, 2017
- Regulations Will Create Scalability Challenges for Canadian Robo-advisors - November 18, 2016
- Making Sense of Your New CRM2 Performance Report - September 14, 2016
- Self-Inflicted Problems: Mutual Fund Industry Has Fought Investor-Friendly Reforms - July 21, 2016
- Beware of Advertisements for F-series Investment Funds - May 27, 2016
- Does Hoarding Cash Protect Investors from the Bear? - March 31, 2016
- Reduced Fund Payout Is Good But Beware of Unsavoury Sales Pitch - December 16, 2015
- High-payout Funds Are a Cash Flow Mirage - November 27, 2015
- SPIVA Report Interesting but Misses Key Message for Investors - November 6, 2015
- Investors Need More Meaningful Risk Measures - July 22, 2015